• LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can you explain why you think that requiring people to use public domain or ask for permission to use non-public domain content to train image or text generators would benefit corporations? How does that benefit OpenAI, making them ask before using someones content?

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It obviously benefits Meta by hindering the competition and by giving them another source of income.

      As to OpenAI, I expect that Microsoft could supply them with quite some user data but I don’t think OAI would be a major beneficiary, at first. OpenAI is, after all, a comparatively recent start-up. I think the biggest immediate gains would go to the established Big Tech firms that have their fingers on a lot of user data.

      Major content owners, like the NYT, would be able to sell their content again. They have that lying around anyway, so it’s pure profit for the owners. Corporations like Getty would also be able to make a killing, not just for being major content owners, but also because they are in the business of ensuring the “provenance” of media. If it’s necessary to ask everyone and keep proof on file then they got you covered, for a price.

      In the long run, I would expect companies like OpenAI to come out on top. They have their fingers on content generation, so the inequalities would just compound.