• viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think you understand how copyrights work. If they are abolished, everybody is free to redistribute your creation without compensation or even acknowledgement. The moment you put it out there, it’s instantly public domain.

    That means we’d have no more professionally produced movies, series, books, songs, games, etc., but would be stuck with what’s essentially fan art.

    Sure, there are talented artists out there who produce music as a hobby, youtubers who make great videos and such, but it would be the end of commercial productions.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      That means we’d have no more professionally produced movies, series, books, songs, games, etc., but would be stuck with what’s essentially fan art.

      we had professionally produced songs and books and games and plays before copyright. you are making that up.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        They are idealizing a pay-the-creator system. They are arguing for a system that is kinda coming together with patreon-like stuff.

        You seem to be arguing that people will just buy the cheapest identical copy. Which is hard to argue against, but there are people out there that pay creators that give their work for free. Copyright law certainly protects creators. But it’s cool to see some creators monetizing on open-licensed work.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, kinda. I forgot which side of the argument the reply I replied to was on. I guess you can just flip the "you"s and "they"s. Or am I still off-base?