A few surprises here, namely that PHEVs will pay a lower rate of RUCs, I was under the impression there would be a rebate scheme for petrol purchased.

No revisions to the weight brackets, which I imagine will be necessary before all vehicles eventually go to RUCs.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Most motorways are actually cost positive as far as maintenance is concerned, due to the relatively low maintenance cost relative to the amount of traffic they serve.

    Out of curiosity, which projects do you think will be “white elephants”?

    • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      All of them. They will increase sprawl, increase emissions and make congestion worse in cities.

        • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think I do, spending tens of billions of dollars on motorways to make traffic worse and increase transport emissions when they need to be reducing is a bad deal. It also starved the rest of the road network of maintenance funds the last time they did this.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            A “white elephant” is something that isn’t being used, or is too expensive to maintain.

            You can always tell the office workers on here, they have no concept of the idea some people need a vehicle to do their job.

            • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Wow, trying to take it personal huh. People who need a vehicle for work would benefit from people who have other options besides driving through fewer vehicles on the road. I have told you this before, but you seem to be trying to claim I’m advocating people not to have vehicles fullstop.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                See, you can repeat the same line as much as you want, but it just doesn’t work like that.

                The Kapiti coast, for example, has great public transport, especially in and out of Wellington, and traffic was still a nightmare until transmission gully opened.

                The Hutt Valley is the same, great public transport available, and yet the motorway still chokes up at rush hour.

                Reality just doesn’t align with your trite catchphrases, unfortunately.

                • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I love the PT Wellington does have, and am glad it’s there but calling it great and implying its all fine and not in need of a significant upgrade is imo an enormous stretch.

                  There are very regular bus replacements at the moment, they shut down when the tracks heat up, the jville line is massively speed limited, services are infrequent out of commuting times and the whole system is geared to getting people into town. It’s not a service many people can rely on for most of their trips and it forces people to drive and create the traffic you complain about. And that’s not even getting into the buses.