Welcome again to everybody! This is your friendly reminder, growling at the United States from Orbit is praxis Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is our weekly discussion thread!

We have a Matrix homeserver at genzedong.xyz. See this thread for information about our Matrix space.

Short reading list for new MLs here. To find theory, try marxists.org, Anna’s Archive, libgen, or Sci-Hub (for scientific articles). If an article is unavailable, try the Wayback Machine.

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Handheld ones? Asking because the TOS-1 has been used plenty in the war, and while it’s likely classified as an MLRS by the west, it’s called “heavy flamethrower system” in Russian.

      Likewise, Shmel thermobaric launcher is also classified as a “flamethrower”.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah with the Russian military you can pretty much always translate “flamethrower” as some kind of thermobaric weapons. Flamethrowers are kids stuff when you can turn entire buildings in to dust or rip the lungs out of everyone in a bunker complex without having to get within a mile of it.

        • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Aye, I figured it required clarification because when one reads “flamethrower” in media, it usually brings up the image of a WW1 style firehose with a backpack canister, wielded by a gasmask-wearing German. Which I suspect might be intentional.

          They’re still horrendous weapons, imo. But surely it’s not as horrific as using white phosphorus, like the yanks did in Iraq?