Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
An explosive being used to cause serious damage to property in order to “influence a government” is terrorism under the Terrorism Act. This is a leopards eating face moment for those who thought these laws would only apply to brown people.
Literally in the legal definition in the Terrorism Act:
(2) Action falls within this subsection if it:
involves serious violence against a person
involves serious damage to property
endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action
creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public
is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system
Also, poor people in London don’t generally own cars. Driving is not an efficient way to get around London and it’s a luxury.
This is a tax on those better-off Londoners who do drive, and who drive older polluting cars - or who live outside London but drive their older polluting cars into London - to protect air quality for poor Londoners who don’t drive but do suffer from the consequences of cars.
Also there’s a massive scrappage scheme so that minority of poor Londoners who do drive - and who happen to old a petrol car that’s almost old enough to vote - can get thousands of pounds of government money towards a new one.
I bet that they will go on about their mental health issues. Thats the get out of jail free card for white terrorists.
Mate it’s a camera made for punishing poor people. It’s hardly terrorism. It’s government/council infrastructure, no use to a civillian
An explosive being used to cause serious damage to property in order to “influence a government” is terrorism under the Terrorism Act. This is a leopards eating face moment for those who thought these laws would only apply to brown people.
Literally in the legal definition in the Terrorism Act:
Also, poor people in London don’t generally own cars. Driving is not an efficient way to get around London and it’s a luxury.
This is a tax on those better-off Londoners who do drive, and who drive older polluting cars - or who live outside London but drive their older polluting cars into London - to protect air quality for poor Londoners who don’t drive but do suffer from the consequences of cars.
Also there’s a massive scrappage scheme so that minority of poor Londoners who do drive - and who happen to old a petrol car that’s almost old enough to vote - can get thousands of pounds of government money towards a new one.
So you’re talking bullshit.
Yeah but it’s still terrorism it’s a bomb it could blow up at any time it could go wrong and kill someone.