• misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I do know about it. I don’t believe nobody would have covered for Orban.

      • letmesleep@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I guess that depends on what the other leaders said. Even outside EU rules states can exert quite a bit of pressure on other states hence I don’t believe that a small country like Slovakia, despite it’s Russian-friendly government, would dare to become the target of the ire of the countries making up 97% of the EU’s population and 98% of its GDP.

      • rstein@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Poland would have under PiS, but not anymore. Unless Slovakia steps up, who would? All others see Orban as a criminal, who siphons money off and ruins his country.

    • Vincent@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Identifying the breach requires unanimity (excluding the state concerned), but sanctions require only a qualified majority.

      Wait, how does this work? Can sanctions be instated without identifying a country as being in breach? Or is unanimity first required, and only after that, the majority can decide what the sanction is?