• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t think you can view hookups outside of their material conditions. Hookups under capitalism are transactional because everything is.

    • Absolute@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      this is the only take imo, hookups in a communist society would have a completely different character to what they are now. People hookup casually now id say primarily cause they want/need to have some human affection or are bored, and that is a symptom of our society where people are largely alienated from that

      • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        What if they just like fucking/getting fucked, and want to derive pleasure from sex. I understand what angle you’re taking, but I think you’re looking at it too deeply… people just like sex.

        Now for people paying sex workers I feel like your analysis works better, but not casual hookups.

  • Flamingoaks@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    casual sex is good and if people wanna fuck let them. but i do think capitalist alienation makes people have a tendency towards non lasting relationships that make them less happy. so hookup good but like everything capitalism makes it worse.

    • alicirce@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      She did! https://redsails.org/winged-eros/

      Briefly, Kollontai promotes “Winged Eros”, which is a multifaceted connection between people, and not “Wingless Eros”, which is sex without friendship or emotion. But on the other hand, she also denounces the bourgeois ideal of love, which is possessive and centered around the economic unit of the married couple, and which denies the multifaceted nature of love.

      The essay covers more than just that though: she starts by tracing how ideals of love change as socioeconomic systems develop, and she ends with a discussion of what proletarian ideals of love could be. It’s a great essay.

      • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is an excellent essay, but I would say that Kollontai would be against hook-ups and hook-up culture… its more that we can form deep, meaningful relationships sans possession, and outside of the framework of bourgeois monogamy.

  • relay@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    Call me out if you think this is bullshit.

    Relative to the feudal conception of sex only after marriage as the acceptable form of relations to have (not that people didn’t get around before then), I’d say that it is an improvement to protestant/catholic traditional forms of relations. Various forms of birth control unburdened women the full consequences of free sex.

    I suspect that the “free love” movement was kind of a movement for white petite bourgeoisie to just use social justice as a meme to have sex with alot of women. The new term is “sex positivity”, but sometimes that really is just encouraging sexual relationships over relationships that actually promote commitment. I don’t know to what extent this is intentionally promoting people to spend money on dating apps, memes to pretend to be the ideals of masculinity/feminitity over to seduce, but over time the mask slips. This results in therapy. This results in marriages of unhappy people or children without both parents. This produces more miserable people to create more gears for the capitalist machine to keep on running. All of these things cost money to the people and promote GDP growth. Promoting animosity between men and women and rightfully seeing each other as deceitful creates conflict to obscure class relations. Not all people buy into this bullshit but this way of thinking seems to create dysfunctional relationships.

    I suspect we should build institutions that can take feminism seriously and encourage relationships that nurture both parties in more complex ways than just sexual ways. This does not mean we fully conform back to the old ways that are trans/homophobic. We can recognize what works in relationships for most people but we don’t need to alienate all of the outliers either. Mental healthcare for all would be a boon for everyone in the society.

  • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sex is highly weaponized so to say in our capitalist society and in a socialist society we would have to unlearn/relearn a lot of things.

    That being said, there is nothing wrong with hookups. People like sex and they will probably always like sex. I personally haven’t thought about it too much.

  • Munrock ☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the culture is a result of people reaching for human connection. The apps are exploitation of it, and shape it into something ugly.

    But it’s all a symptom. It’s not something to be cured by banning it or reforming it. It will wither on its own when humanity has its humanity restored.

  • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have no issue with it, but tinder and similar apps are intentionally made to be addictive and ineffective. I once downloaded it just to check it out with zero dating intentions, ended up spending every free minute swiping left because my pigeon brain really likes scrolling regardless of what’s being scrolled.

  • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Sexual education is vital. People must understand how the male and female human bodies work, how to spot STD’s, cancer signs, UTI’s, and how to be properly hygienic downstairs. People need to understand what are and how to use condoms, female condoms, safe lube, Plan B, IUD’s, birth control, copper implants, pregnancy tests, etc. People need to understand the weight behind having a child and the risks+how to avoid them. People need to fully comprehend and understand consent. People need to know what’s ok to put in your body (the amount of people who think using coconut oil, olive oil, hair brushes, broom handles, etc is safe is absurd)

    If we can accomplish that communist world… I could care less who is fucking who, what people do after going home from the club together, or what’s going on in the bedroom.

  • angrytoadnoises@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think a hook up culture, while not inherently bad, is indicative of a society that doesn’t prioritize human connection. I need to reiterate that I have absolutely no issues with casual sex culture and experienced my fair share of it growing up. However, my true happiness came from long standing relationships that were incredibly hard to maintain under capitalist culture. I think a fairer and more equal society would see less of a hook up culture develop simply because people would find it easier to connect with the people they truly care about.

    • FuckBigTech347@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This applies to pretty much any human connection/relationship. It’s basically impossible to develop and maintain fulfilling, long lasting friendships with people under capitalism. I firmly believe that if hypothetically, socialism were to happen tomorrow, then in the following decades we would see hookup culture disappearing. No one actually wants quick and shallow relationships where no one really knows who can be trusted.