Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
A Colorado judge has rejected an attempt to remove former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 primary ballot based on the claim that he is constitutionally barred from office because of the January 6 insurrection.
I watched this trial, I saw the arguments and this really pisses me off. The defense was incredibly bad when talking about holding office. The Minnesota one I get, it was more about the RNC and DNC choosing their own people to represent them. This one though, the petitioners gave so many examples of how it’s an office and the defense was like, “nuh ah.” I thought I would be okay with whatever she decided but this seems like she thought she was in law school and having fun debating about it. I’m glad she called out the insurrection, but does it help?
I watched this trial, I saw the arguments and this really pisses me off. The defense was incredibly bad when talking about holding office. The Minnesota one I get, it was more about the RNC and DNC choosing their own people to represent them. This one though, the petitioners gave so many examples of how it’s an office and the defense was like, “nuh ah.” I thought I would be okay with whatever she decided but this seems like she thought she was in law school and having fun debating about it. I’m glad she called out the insurrection, but does it help?