Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
He also explained why it was ok in his opinion to attack and kill civilians: because the citizens of the US voted for their government and therefore it’s policies… by that standard it would be completely ok if Israel started killing civilians ON PURPOSE because Hamas is Gaza‘s government.
He also explained why it was ok in his opinion to attack and kill civilians: because the citizens of the US voted for their government and therefore it’s policies… by that standard it would be completely ok if Israel started killing civilians ON PURPOSE because Hamas is Gaza‘s government.
Ok?
I mean, it’s the same rational any side uses to justify killing civilians. “They’re all the enemy.”
Hamas did it.
Israel is doing it.
The US has done it.
This mf out here going to bat for literally bin laden on some 4 wrongs make a right tip.
deleted by creator
Rationalizing collateral damage is not the same as intending to cause mass death without distinction.
If the US or Israel’s goal was maximizing death, the numbers would be astronomically higher.
It is false equivalence.