• Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck yeah I would. Too many young people putting their lives at risk without realizing the consequences.

    • ivenoidea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nice, then that we agree on. But it gets a bit more difficult.

      Would you set the smoking age to 25 as well? Probably, since it’s so unhealthy. But then do we set fast food at age 25 as well? More people die of heart issues than anything else, and that’s mainly driven by the awful diet most people live on.

      Should people under 25 be able to go into any sort of debt? If not, then that means fixing the education and healthcare systems (which seems like a good thing). But what if someone goes into debt to buy an apartment or house? Or even just a car? Having debt can be really bad for mental health, and depending on where you have it physical health as well.

      If we keep thinking along those lines, do we allow people under 25 to watch TV and play video games? Both activities cause people to become very sedentary, which is bad for health as well.

      Do we allow people under 25 to have desk jobs? But then along the same lines, do we allow people under 25 to have physical jobs? Both can negatively impact your body in different ways, and a undeveloped brain might not consider all the risks involved.

      I’m not hating on you, I just think it’s interesting to consider just how far you would take that logic.

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I back NZ in their decision to ban cigarettes entirely. What a joyless drug to kill yourself with.

        All of your other examples at least have some upside up em.