To me, the two major problems are:

  1. no namespaces

Someone uploads “serde2”? that’s blocked forever. Someone uploads a typo version of a popular package? Too bad for you, learn how to type.

  1. the github connection

If you want to contribute to crates.io you’re bound to github. No gitlab, codeberg, gitee, sourcehut, etc.

Not sure if there are any other problems, but those two seem like the biggest things and #1 is AFAIK not something they ever want to change + it would be difficult to as one would need a migration strategy.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If Github isn’t used for source control, why on earth is it the only auth provider?

    Why has crates.io given Microsoft the ability to control who can and cannot publish Rust code?

    Namespacing is whatever, but IMO the real issue is the disproportionate and unnecessary amount of power given to a company known for pushing monopolies.

    • BB_C@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago
      • GitHub wasn’t always owned by Microsoft. At least get your dates right.
      • Yes, GH shouldn’t be the sole auth provider.