Kudos to Ars Technica to interviewing the Devil. The comments section of that post is *not *kind.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And I’m making my statement clear: I had to look up what “ratio’d” even means, because it’s a term that would only be used by people that believe any conversations on Twitter even matter. The format is terrible for honest discourse.

    The article itself points to Denuvo being willing to hire independent reviewers of people’s choice to verify that Denuvo, when implemented well, does not affect game performance. The article also has a number of rational explanations as to why game builds that people claim “prove Denovu decreases performance” are not always the best proof.

    If they’ve picked reviewers, and they’re people you don’t trust, that’s a perfectly fair stance for argument. But requesting an independent review makes perfect sense to me. If, on the other hand, they prove themselves right, it would not be the first time “hero internet detectives” got things completely wrong.

    We’re bringing some bad behaviors from Reddit and Twitter here. Let’s not start with not reading the article.