Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Maybe if the article actually got to the point instead of rambled on and on about “thirst traps” and the like, it would be more obvious what it was actually (trying to be) about.
Of course they’re not real. They’re reproductions of reality. This has been true of images since cave paintings.
That’s not what the article is about and I’m impressed how many people in the comments completely missed the point.
Maybe if the article actually got to the point instead of rambled on and on about “thirst traps” and the like, it would be more obvious what it was actually (trying to be) about.
That’s bc the article sucks.
deleted by creator