Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Yet again, the dog will not attack UNLESS it is commanded to by a human.
If no one ever commands the dog to attack, it will never attack anyone. It is safer than plenty of dogs who have never had any training and attack people because of it.
It’s dangerous because it can be commanded. We should not have a dog anywhere near people that would attack on command. That’s insane to want to allow that somewhere.
There are tons and tons of dogs who attack without being commanded to and you want to kill the dog that knows through extensive training not to attack people. That’s ludicrous.
No, teach them to only attack people when commanded. Unlike other dogs which could attack indiscriminately. I have no idea why you think an untrained dog is safer than a trained one. Do you know how many people are attacked by untrained dogs every year?
I never taught my dogs to attack someone and they never have. I don’t get why this would be an issue. Someone taught them to do this and they tried to murder someone. The “trainer” needs to be put down
Did you teach your dogs to only be aggressive on command and to never show aggression otherwise? Because that’s how police dogs are trained. Can you be certain your dogs would never get aggressive even in stressful circumstances? Because, again, that’s how police dogs are trained.
I would bet your dogs are nowhere near as well-trained.
Yet again, the dog will not attack UNLESS it is commanded to by a human.
If no one ever commands the dog to attack, it will never attack anyone. It is safer than plenty of dogs who have never had any training and attack people because of it.
It’s dangerous because it can be commanded. We should not have a dog anywhere near people that would attack on command. That’s insane to want to allow that somewhere.
There are tons and tons of dogs who attack without being commanded to and you want to kill the dog that knows through extensive training not to attack people. That’s ludicrous.
It’s even worse if they learned it through extensive training. The dog shouldn’t be put down but the “person” who trained it should be
It’s bad to teach a dog not to attack people? Really?
They teach them to attack people. That is why the trainer “person” is a criminal.
No, teach them to only attack people when commanded. Unlike other dogs which could attack indiscriminately. I have no idea why you think an untrained dog is safer than a trained one. Do you know how many people are attacked by untrained dogs every year?
I never taught my dogs to attack someone and they never have. I don’t get why this would be an issue. Someone taught them to do this and they tried to murder someone. The “trainer” needs to be put down
Did you teach your dogs to only be aggressive on command and to never show aggression otherwise? Because that’s how police dogs are trained. Can you be certain your dogs would never get aggressive even in stressful circumstances? Because, again, that’s how police dogs are trained.
I would bet your dogs are nowhere near as well-trained.