Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Political economist Radhika Desai discusses the origins of neoliberalism as a fringe ideology and how it became dominant, fueling extreme inequality, instabi...
If I recall correctly, I think she was referring to the value of US bonds dropping. She was saying that SVB was holding bonds because they were supposed to be a safe investment, but due to rates going up that turned out not to be the case.
If I recall correctly, I think she was referring to the value of US bonds dropping. She was saying that SVB was holding bonds because they were supposed to be a safe investment, but due to rates going up that turned out not to be the case.
She said that too but she also said they couldn’t get bailed out https://youtu.be/lSTLsHAGoVA?t=4887
2011 01:21:20,040 --> 01:21:22,020 Silicon Valley Bank and the other banks
2012 01:21:22,020 --> 01:21:24,239 that collapsed recently and and and by
2013 01:21:24,239 --> 01:21:26,580 the way another learning Factor
2014 01:21:26,580 --> 01:21:28,800 the United States government could not
2015 01:21:28,800 --> 01:21:30,360 possibly have bailed them out because
2016 01:21:30,360 --> 01:21:32,460 the fact of the matter is that the
2017 01:21:32,460 --> 01:21:34,320 American public knows the U.S public
2018 01:21:34,320 --> 01:21:37,800 knows that uh the last time it’s the
2019 01:21:37,800 --> 01:21:39,719 banks that got bailed out so any
2020 01:21:39,719 --> 01:21:42,420 government that does it again is going
2021 01:21:42,420 --> 01:21:45,719 to face an enormous amount of popular
Ah right, I guess SVB did go under, it’s the account holders who got bailed out in the end right?
Oh I see that’s the difference. Thank you.