• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I question if cutting them off would actually hurt them that much. Like, it would hurt, but not in a project-ending way. It’s far better IMO to use the prospect as encouragement for them to not be openly disruptive in the future.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hurting Meta shouldn’t be the goal. Not providing direct access for Meta tentacles to the userbase should be.

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I won’t kid myself that our data will be used either way. What I’m concerned about the most might be the negative attention that Meta will bring to federation. I have little doubt government regulation and strangulation will follow.

          If my understanding is correct, it also means that other instances will be footing part of the bill and doing the legwork to propagate and extend Meta’s spiderweb?

            • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m guilty as well.

              One thing that did occur to me just now, is how Meta’s current platforms are the focus of gov pressure to censor free speech and thought crime, under the guise of public safety. What happens when this new platform federates? I think it’d be naive not to expect that stink to follow it. I have a sneaking suspicion Meta will filter content that doesn’t adhere to their own TOS, so does the blame shift to the rest of the fediverse?

              Lots of open questions, but the whole thing stinks, IMO.