• PupBiru@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    decreasing the number of SEX WORKERS was not the aim, and is honestly irrelevant

    it has, however, significantly increased the safety of those doing sex work and allowed them to make choices rather than being stuck

    there are other reports and follow ups that go with that piece; that’s just kinda the culmination and the government PR piece

    • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These changes clearly haven’t had an effect then. I also question your safety claims as it seems that safety regulations were being rolled back according to that article you sent

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        they had the desired effect, it just wasn’t the effect you were looking for. these changes effectively increase the safety of sex work

        the regulations in question were rolled back because they were made in 1994 as a first attempt at legislation… when certain things are found not to be necessary or to cause more harm than good, they were updated

        the last part is really the crux of the issue: regulations that people largely ignore are unhelpful… they only mean that people are less likely to seek help for fear of punishment, and that leads to more abuse

        we had sex worker registration so that the government could track effectiveness of policy changes and revoke licenses if people weren’t following the rules, but it was found that some people were doing sex work without registration, and then were reluctant to seek help if they got exploited or abused for fear that they’d get into legal trouble

        other systems were put in place to ensure everyone stays safe, and the registrations were no longer necessary