• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Maintenance Phase podcast had a good ep on how he deliberately misconstrues studies to support his antivax positions. It’s on their free feed for anyone who’s curious. Charlatan all the way down.

  • J12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean the good news is he’ll get the dumbass vote. The Qs, bleach drinkers, horse medicine consumers which for the most part vote for Rs.

    I think it’s good for Biden.

    He’s correct about Blackrock though, wanting to buy up housing and artificially inflate rents. It’s a goddamn shame Biden won’t step in and fix the housing crisis by stopping corporations from owning single family houses.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Both likely. The Republicans who dislike Trump enough to vote Democrat would probably prefer RFK, as well as the republicans who dislike Trump but were gonna vote for him because they would never vote Democrat. The republicans who want to see a R president no mater what will still vote Trump no matter their thoughts on him but little is gonna change their vote. He’ll probably pull a lot of middle right voters too, middle left maybe not so much. My worry is the coalition of republicans and independents who hate trump is only growing and now they have a candidate who’s not a democrat and also not trump.

      Its kinda funny hes basically only gonna siphon Republicans, but that still doesn’t mean only Trump voters these days, interesting times.

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d bet that he would get mostly GOP-registered votes, but they would also be the Republicans who are most likely to vote against Trump. So kinda both?

  • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In general if you belong to one party and you switch to independent and you pull more voters from the opposite party, you’re out of touch.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I said this somewhere else too, but this guy reminds me of my 70 year old aunts who get all their news from clickbait articles on Facebook and who think sharing those articles with you will change your mind

  • Rally@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do we think he is going to take votes away from anyone? I think the USA will need all the help it can get to keep Trump out of the white house. Trumps people look like they will never turn on him

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the theory is that he’ll siphon votes away from Democrats using the name Kennedy. I’m sure there will be a few. But not many.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He’s nothing more than yet another long-respected brand name that’s currently going down the shitter.

  • Faildini@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, he’s an idiot and he certainly won’t get my vote, but I can’t even be mad about him running. I’m just glad to see a ballot with more than two relevant people on it. Sick and tired of choosing between “dumbass with a D next to his name” and “more dangerous dumbass with an R next to his name”.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      For fuck sake… Ralph Nader was not that long ago. In our first past the post system, a third option will always be a spoiler.