• Hyggyldy@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn’t do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

    • prd@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand.

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you can’t tell me what’s forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he’d face and from where?

        • prd@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it.

        • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          “President” is not “King”

          Money is controlled by Republican Congress.

          Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President.

    • sik0fewl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not defending it, since I’m not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he’s done it.

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cool. You feel better now that you’ve joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit?