Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
One of the 2 SpaceX falcon 9 failures, CRS-7, was caused by the manufacturer claiming a strut (metal pole) was rated to N lbs but in reality its failure point was N/2.
SpaceX sourced the material from an industrial supply company, not an aerospace company, and that company’s material testing procedures were less strict. During launch the strut failed and caused a “rapid unscheduled disassembly”. Or, as I like to say, an sad boom.
It’s a little different than what’s going on with these aircraft but it’s similar. These companies really need to test the stuff they buy because your supply chain
Yay story time!
One of the 2 SpaceX falcon 9 failures, CRS-7, was caused by the manufacturer claiming a strut (metal pole) was rated to N lbs but in reality its failure point was N/2.
SpaceX sourced the material from an industrial supply company, not an aerospace company, and that company’s material testing procedures were less strict. During launch the strut failed and caused a “rapid unscheduled disassembly”. Or, as I like to say, an sad boom.
It’s a little different than what’s going on with these aircraft but it’s similar. These companies really need to test the stuff they buy because your supply chain