• Cyberwitch_7493@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s kinda like comparing universal healthcare to individual payer for-profit insurance. One rewards everyone as a universal system with consistency (at least in theory) and the other rewards only rich people.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The government provides

        Except USPS is completely self funded, and does NOT use any of your tax dollars.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s an excellent point, but it is still a government service.

          Being administered by the government, self sufficient, and mandated to not make excess revenue just makes it a remarkably easy to justify service.

          • wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s nothing inherently stopping us from crowdfunding services with a similar “business model” separate from the government. Can’t wait for that light bulb to flicker on for most of us.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I actually live in a city where the public works is a publicly owned utility, and it’s pretty great. Rates are reasonable, excess revenue goes to infrastructure improvements rather than shareholders, and leadership is paid reasonably ($300k+benefits for CEO equivalent), and key decisions are voted on by the city council.

              I’m curious why you want something separate from the government. To me, a crowd funded publicly controlled service is a government service in all but name and accountability.

              • wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The city/state level is much more likely to achieve things like this and that’s great but it’s not always the case. Regulatory capture and complex relationships with industry players make the government an imperfect vehicle for doing what’s best for communities. Sometimes a downright impediment to it.

                My point is that there’s nothing inherently stopping us from doing it for ourselves in any situation where the state is not optimally stewarding the public trust on our behalf, and the sooner we figure that out the sooner we start solving up-til-now rather intractable problems.

                • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I suppose my point was more that publicly owned funded and managed is functionally what government is.
                  Any issues with government management of a utility is just as applicable to a crowd funded publicly managed one.

                  There’s nothing stopping us from altering the state to optimally steward the public trust. It’s probably easier because the state already exists, and has mechanics for dealing with the types of civil issues that arise from community organization on complex projects.

                  The government isn’t something that’s apart from us, it’s made of us.

                  What, to you, is the actual difference between a community working together and organizing their resources for the common benefit, and a government?

                  • wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sorry for the delayed reply. Been AFK.

                    What, to you, is the actual difference between a community working together and organizing their resources for the common benefit, and a government?

                    The ability to collaborate solely with values-aligned community rather than being forced to reach consensus across all people in a geographic region regardless of how antagonistic or philosophically misaligned we are.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why they oppose universal healthcare here in the US – they wan’t access to special treatment.

      What they don’t realize is they can still have Mommy’s Super Special Boy™ access, since even in a system of universal healthcare, there’s still a demand for private practice.

      So really, it just boils down to them hating poor people and other marginalized groups

      • bilboswaggings@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also universal healthcare can afford specialized equipment because the amount of people they would service is higher than the profit driven hospital

        Rather than the current system of specialized equipment still having to make profit so treatment costs increase

    • prayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except you would be very upset if your Uber eats took 3-5 days to arrive, as a postal system does. The cost is because it’s an entirely different product, an on-demand courier system. It’s closer to comparing universal healthcare with having a doctor on retainer (if such a thing exists).