Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
It was hard to tell if she said it because she believed it, or just because she’s trying to win as cable news analysts have said about her other policies
More than a few high profile anti-gun people have owned firearms. Diane Feinstein comes to mind as another example.
ALL of the super wealthy anti-gun people, like Michael Bloomberg, have no issue being protected by people with firearms.
It’s not the guns that they’re against. They’re against them being owned by
peasantsregular people.An armed proletariat is much more difficult to control.
No, she’s not. She said so.
It was hard to tell if she said it because she believed it, or just because she’s trying to win as cable news analysts have said about her other policies