• fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Whatever you do, don’t get in a time machine back to 1998 and become a Unix sysadmin.

      (Though we didn’t have CL-PPCRE then. It’s really the best thing that ever happened to regex.)

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I have to admit that using CL-PPCRE does not really help me understanding the regexp any better. But this may be because I deal with complex regexps for decades now, and I just read them.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I upvoted you because I consider Perl write only (used to know it, now it inspires readable code as a high priority)

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Let’s put it this way: You can produce unreadable code in basically any language. With Perl, it is just a bit easier.

        And of course if you have the discipline of a good programmer, even your casual Perl programs should be readable. That’s what differenciates a good programmer from a hacker.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, I was younger then, perhaps less disciplined, and as always, given enough work you can decompile or regenerate anything. Still, I contend, the nature of Perl, powerful as it was, lent itself to unmaintainable messes, and I’m not talking regex’s, which is why it has faded, no amount of get gud withstanding.