Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
The alleged Nintendo Switch modder who refused to shut down their business despite a warning from Mario maker Nintendo now appears to be taking the titan on in court without a lawyer.
He’s going to court without a lawyer, which is always always always a bad idea (I wish that weren’t the case but it is a fact);
He’s tried to claim he doesn’t own or operate the business in question;
His defenses are spaghetti thrown at the wall:
His defenses include fair use, invalid copyrights, a lack of standing, fraudulent inducement, an arbitration clause, failure to state a claim, and unjust enrichment.
Many of these (in fact, all but the arbitration clause; that’s probably from their TOS but won’t save him) are SovCit arguments and simply do not apply. They’re going to be dismantled in seconds in court, and I know that with at best a slightly-better-than-layperson understanding of the law. This guy is going to get thoroughly Bowser’d.
Pro se parties often get a more relaxed interpretation of their arguments because they can’t be expected to know everything about the law unlike an attorney. If there’s a chance that any of those arguments has merit then the judge will allow it.
Many of these (in fact, all but the arbitration clause; that’s probably from their TOS but won’t save him) are SovCit arguments and simply do not apply. They’re going to be dismantled in seconds in court, and I know that with at best a slightly-better-than-layperson understanding of the law. This guy is going to get thoroughly Bowser’d.
Pro se parties often get a more relaxed interpretation of their arguments because they can’t be expected to know everything about the law unlike an attorney. If there’s a chance that any of those arguments has merit then the judge will allow it.