• Donut@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    The article itself admits that it’s hinged on two “substantial what if’s”

    Just be patient and wait until more information comes out.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      We know it’s a patent suit though. Just because the article focuses on specific patents doesn’t mean those parents are not already ridiculous and that the lawsuit, even if it’s not based on those specific patents, is also ridiculous.

    • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you read the article, those “ifs” are only in reference to whether a US suit will be filed. The analysis of Nintendo’s BS patents all makes sense.