• TerribleTortoise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    We can all agree that it’s a tragedy that this animal died.

    The other consideration is that polar bears are amongst the most relentless and vicious predators around. A polar bear around an inhabited area is very much a serious safety threat. Iceland doesn’t have any animal predators and therefore also wouldn’t have the trained people or equipment necessary to deal with neutralizing and relocating this bear.

    I would have liked to have seen the animal safely moved. But I suspect there’s more context to this story that we don’t have beyond the headline.

    • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      A bit more context from reading the article

      • the bear was actively going through the trash of a woman’s summer house while she was there which is why it was reported

      • the Iceland environmental agency actively decided to not try and relocate it, likely due to how expensive it would be to take back to Greenland

      • the bear is also being studied for potential diseases/parasites, how healthy it was, body fat, etc. which is nice I guess

  • ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    In this case, as you can see in the picture, the bear was very close to a summer house. There was an old woman in there.

    Oh no! A women in a protected environment might be anxious?! SHOOT IT!!!

    seriously, Iceland, I think we all expected more out of you.