Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Thanks. I recall seeing this info before, and I questioned the same thing before. While any depletion is bad, is 17 tons the windmill to attack when other emissions affecting ozone and other effects are far, far greater? I get that it’s saying a larger increase means more residuals left, but can we possibly pump out satellites anywhere close to what’s done from the ground?
I can’t find any very recent numbers, but here’s an example of what I’ve found both in emissions and potential emission sources. https://news.mit.edu/2020/emissions-ozone-cfc-chemicals-0317. I just don’t see satellite reentry as the headline it’s made out to be, plus we can find alternates that reduce it further.
Thanks. I recall seeing this info before, and I questioned the same thing before. While any depletion is bad, is 17 tons the windmill to attack when other emissions affecting ozone and other effects are far, far greater? I get that it’s saying a larger increase means more residuals left, but can we possibly pump out satellites anywhere close to what’s done from the ground?
I can’t find any very recent numbers, but here’s an example of what I’ve found both in emissions and potential emission sources. https://news.mit.edu/2020/emissions-ozone-cfc-chemicals-0317. I just don’t see satellite reentry as the headline it’s made out to be, plus we can find alternates that reduce it further.
No problem