• Bassman1805@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The lore is that the saarlac actually keeps you alive while digesting you. ~~Like, it puts roots in that act as life support so it has a constant source of protein or whatever. ~~ eh, that last but might not be accurate but there is some kind of enzyme in their stomach that keeps you alive? Whatever.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      140
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That makes as much sense as The Matrix using people for energy. You can’t feed people to keep them alive and get more energy out than just digesting (or in the Matrix burning) that food for energy.

      • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        110
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I could be wrong, but I think the original idea for the matrix was that they were using human brains for processing power and not energy. But someone in the movie making process decided people wouldn’t understand that and instead went with the battery analogy.

        • RustyShackleford@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          57
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Studio executives made the decision, you know… because there hasn’t be a long list of projects they’ve fucked over the years with their notes. 🙄

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          2 months ago

          Morpheus is the only one we ever hear the battery analogy from anyway. He might well be wrong about that interpretation, and the brain processors are what’s really going on.

          • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            My headcanon is that he tried the more technical and correct explanation, but most people he told it to started to go a bit glassy-eyed during that part, so he simplified his pitch.

            • Default_Defect@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              The showing of the battery is a good visual to sell the explanation too, regardless of it not making sense “realistically”

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            I believe Switch refers to Neo as coppertop at some point which would be the battery analogy as well too.

        • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          The real reason is the machines are using all the human brains to fake generative AI responses to keep share prices going up in line with their original programming.

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The humans blocked out the sun, and probably dashed all other power sources available to the Machines. What you have left are self-replicating humans. Makes sense to keep them alive and farm them just enough to tide you over before their next breeding cycle

                • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well they scorched the sky which created lots of wind and lightning storms. Maybe they harnessed those sources, or this being the future, used the scant antimatter generated from each strike?

                  • Klear@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    So they do have energy sources after all! So tell me again why do they need to farm humans?

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe you get “digested” in the sense that you get incorporated into the sarlacc’s body, like it’s using you in a parasitic sense. It makes you one of its internal organs, and it keeps you alive as it slowly uses you up over the course of a thousand years (assuming we take that phrase literally). I think acting as a gall bladder for an underground sand monster sounds like a fate worse than death.

        • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Isn’t that basically the mechanism of how early complex cells formed millions of years ago.

          First it was just basic cells … they fed off one another and at one point … one cell became incorporated into the other and essentially evolved into an organ of the cell … like mitochondria inside the cell, isn’t it basically thought that it was one it’s own organism at one point and just evolved into an organ inside other cells.

          Same with the human body. I think the estimate is that we are only about 50% of our own generated cells and the rest is just other beneficial cooperative bacteria our body has evolved to take advantage of.

          So the Sarlac taking you in is just incorporating you into it’s body for some function and keeping you alive to fulfill that role … you just happen to be conscious of it and unable to escape the entire time over a thousand years.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        It could be that their prey’s bodies are used for chemical reactions that their own body is incapable of.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Could be it’s using you for nutrients it can’t get normally, so it keeps you alive to milk you for your calcium or whatever for as long as it can.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought it also used them for neural CPU cycles but maybe I’m misremembering

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, that’s exactly the original thing. “Wetware”, basically… But test audiences got upset and confused, so it was changed to “batteries.”

          • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The batteries things was also Morpheus’s explanation, and not necessarily a definitive fact of the fictive universe. Morpheus could have been talking out of his ass, or deliberately over-simplifying for the benefit of Neo, who he knew was kind of a dumbass.

        • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think that was the original idea but they changed it to energy because they thought the audience wouldn’t understand the CPU stuff.

      • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The original script for the Matrix had the machines use human brains for data processing, but the Wachowskis were told by the studio to simplify it.

    • RuBisCO@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Sarlac that lost the ability to grow ‘roots’ and instead worked out venom and energy storage (fat and muscle) would outcompete and supplant the sarlacs still producing energetically-expensive, overly-complicated stasis bellies.

      What happens if they momentarily fail to keep their meals alive, do they starve or become poisoned by the rotting meat? Do they have issues keeping a varied diet alive? How do they maintain a net positive energy balance after producing all that is required to keep organisms alive? Why not stun them and stash them, like wasps and spiders? Why not fatten up like -gestures broadly at all life-. Fat requires very little maintenance.

      Could one, in theory, rescue one’s friends were they trapped in a sarlac?

      Sounds like an organism that would quickly be out of business were there any competition at all.

      edit: How do they handle the waste produced by the meals-in-stasis?

      • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        As long as we’re coming up with overly convoluted reasons that a minor plot device from a fantasy space opera makes sense in a rigorous scientific way, why not assume that they were genetically engineered specifically as a torturous punishment for the Hutt syndicate? Bioengineering is apparently canon, so there’s in-universe justification.

        • RuBisCO@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wouldn’t Jabba being ‘stupid as fuck’ and making erroneous claims about nature be the less convoluted answer here? Bioengineering, canon or not, sounds like the more complicated explanation.

          • Klear@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            This is what I hate about Star Wars lore. Same with the parsecs gaffe (I think it’s even pointed out in the screenplay that Han is transparently bullshitting them).

            Both of these make sense, but no. They had to make super convoluted explanations in secondary sources and everyone treats that as gospel for some reason.