• cmfhsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Because there already are tracks without electricity where I live. When coming from a nearby major city by me, the train has to stop for 40 minutes while they switch from an electric to diesel power car. Same process while taking a train into the city, switching from diesel to electric.

    • teolan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      But even in that case it’s 10x better to have more frequent, cheaper diesel trains than having insanely expensive and heavy battery trains.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m not a rail expert, but I thought for some reason that rails without electricity would be too old/unmaintained to be allowed to serve passenger traffic, lol.

      40 minutes? I would have imagined that everyone would hop off at the station, they’d then drive out to a parking junction, and then drive back the electric train to the station for people to load in again. Isn’t it also very expensive to take the train (you’re from the US I assume)? Not weird that no one wants to take it when it’s in such bad situations :/