• Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 days ago

    I guess if by a kernel of truth you mean an existing train was used on an existing track, then you could almost make it make sense? But since all of this existed before, it’s just a lie.

    I’ll also point out that anybody introducing battery electric trains instead of just electrifying the remaining parts of rail is making an astoundingly bad choice, but that’s almost certainly Germany and not Tesla.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I don’t think you realise how expensive electrifying a line can be, it can be as expensive as building it in the first place. Whereas this technology can be used without modifying the track at all.

      If the line only runs a few times a day, it’s an obvious choice.

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I do realize. I also realize things like weight of the train, cost of the battery packs, the fact those packs will wear and need to be replaced faster than anything else in the system, and much more.