Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Eh, not really. They aren’t called star wars 1, star wars 2, star wars 3, etc.
They all have individual names and they are just ordered 1-9 without it being in the title.
Witcher has the number in the actual title (at least the second and third do)
So instead of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt and then releasing The Witcher 4: ???, I just think it may be more logical to release it as The Witcher ??? 1: ??? or something, just so that it is obvious it’s a separate trilogy and storyline.
If its a new trilogy should they be referring to it as witcher 4?
Wouldn’t it make more sense to call it something like Witcher: ??? 1,2, and 3
I mean, Star Wars is three connected but distinct trilogies numbered 1-9. Same deal?
Eh, not really. They aren’t called star wars 1, star wars 2, star wars 3, etc.
They all have individual names and they are just ordered 1-9 without it being in the title.
Witcher has the number in the actual title (at least the second and third do)
So instead of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt and then releasing The Witcher 4: ???, I just think it may be more logical to release it as The Witcher ??? 1: ??? or something, just so that it is obvious it’s a separate trilogy and storyline.