Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
I mean the US constitution has lots of fancy stuff in it that I’m not sure I take to be so in reality. So I’d definitely prefer if we had some sort of confirmation.
I mean the US constitution has lots of fancy stuff in it that I’m not sure I take to be so in reality. So I’d definitely prefer if we had some sort of confirmation.
So if we don’t have confirmation is not true? But the article on wikipedia without confirmation must be true because is on the internet?
Why you doubt only what is not constructed in your mind?
No, it’s just unconfirmed
The constitution was online too though.
I don’t know what you mean, could you rephrase this one?
Published by an american university.
I just meant that if I was believing/disbelieving stuff just because it was online then I would’ve treated them the same, since both were online