• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is pumped-hydro inefficient or something? All the arguments about flooding land and surveying geography seem bizarre if the alternative includes a big impermeable structure. We’ve got those, for water. They’re called pools. They’re nontrivial because you have to contain pressure that desperately wants to leak out, but holding compressed air is surely harder. Water also doesn’t change temperature when you move it uphill.

    Why is this better than two reservoirs with a pipeline between them?

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        … what, just anywhere flat? Pumped hydro should be feasible wherever there’s a hill.

        If we’re building big weird structures, even that is optional. You can put one pool above-ground and another in-ground. Deep and tall presumably beat wide.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          To actually do the volumes that make pumped hydro practical you need not just a hill but a space which can hold a truly huge volume of water.