• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not according to the etymology. https://www.etymonline.com/word/*removed*

      1786, earlier neger (1568, Scottish and northern England dialect), negar, negur, from French nègre, from Spanish negro (see Negro).

      All of these languages are latin-based languages… So there must be a latin root. If you dig further you find

      from Latin nigrum (nominative niger) “black, dark, sable, dusky” (applied to the night sky, a storm, the complexion), figuratively “gloomy, unlucky, bad, wicked,”

      So yes negro exists in the middle but not as the source necessarily… It would have evolved (if I read the etymology correctly) as Nigrum -> Niger -> Negro/neger/negar/negur -> removed.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Good thing the N word is being censored here, otherwise we might actually learn something.

        I fucking hate indiscriminate censorship. In some context the word is important in order to learn and educate

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah… While admittedly discussions like this one are far outweighed by the negative uses of the term; when discussion is happening where clarity is more relevant than appeasing the euphemism treadmill censorship sucks.

          https://lemmy.saik0.com/comment/3423797 should get you to the original version. My instance doesn’t censor.