• MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    How viable would it be for the government to set up its own state-owned ISP company with minimal or no political influence?

      • Loduz_247@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        In short, that company would be like a less efficient Amtrak and far from being a TVA, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      That would require the government to not be bought out by billionaires. That would require the government NOT working for the billionaires that control them. That would require the government to actually give a fuck about anyone poor.

      In other words it’s never going to happen.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Worked in my home town for about 20 years until they outsourced to our version of Comcast as a ‘cost-saving measure’. Wow, were they stupid.

        It actually worked astoundingly well before that. Hated ISP a? Make a phone call and within an hour your same gear was now on ISP c.

        At a recent job I worked closely with some muni IT people. Their plan is to fibre their area and then price the backhoe access out so the ISPs have to compete over the common infrastructure and can’t restrict access. City doesn’t want to be an ISP; just manage the glass.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      My state has it’s own fiber network that they send to local governments and schools, but as far as I know is not available to the public.