• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you weren’t implying that the article isn’t representative of the current situation then do elaborate on what your comment actually meant using your own words.

    • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i didn’t claim that. i quoted from an independant fact-checking source. take your disagreement to them.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing you quoted from this “independent” source has anything to do with the content of the article. What you engaged in is known as ad hominem fallacy.

        • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          if the source is biased, logically, so would be its contents.

          but nobody is accusing you of thinking logically.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every source is inherently biased, there is no such thing as an unbiased source. It’s incredible that grown ass adults don’t understand this. But nobody is accusing you of thinking logically.