• _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Traffic in my area when going to work is completely random; ranges from 45min to 65 minutes (going home is always hell, at least 70 minutes guaranteed)

    • AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      As someone that lives in a small city where my morning commute is 15 minutes, and 20 on the way home, this is fucking insane to me. 70 minutes is 3/4 of the way to the next town at highway speeds.

      Edit: To add to that, I work four 10s rather than five 8s a week. If I had to drive that long every day for work, I’d only have about an hour and a half - 2 hours to relax before it’s time for bed if I want 8 hours of sleep.

      • _sideffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Believe me, I know. I was lied to when I took this job.

        They said on site is only mandatory for the first two weeks to get up to speed.

        Then I can transition into work from home and come in only when needed.

        Then I approached them because it was almost 2 months at the time, and they replied with “You need supervision so you have to come in”.

        The part that pissed me off is that NO ONE sits next to me or helps me in any way all day.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Dude, you can’t even travel 10 miles in 70 minutes during rush hour in big cities. Half the time you can get out and walk faster than the cars are moving.

    • ObstreperousCanadian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, the tweet is funny, but while most days when I worked in the office would take me roughly the same amount of time to get to work (~45-60min), sometimes there were accidents and such that could add up to hours.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s why I prefer buses. Even if it takes much longer to go to destination, I can always listen to podcasts or watch something on YouTube.

      • _sideffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I was debating it, but it’s close to 2 hours with public transit, with no chances of it being faster.

        I’d have to take one bus, one train, one subway, then another bus

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’d have to take one bus, one train, one subway, then another bus

          That’s why I don’t prefer buses, especially if there are long delays in-between stops.

          When I was younger I had to take the bus to work across town and it involved multiple transfers, long waits, and a 3 mile round trip walk. I had to leave my house at 4:30 am to be on the first bus of the day, which was 4:45 am, just to be at work at 7:10 am. If I missed the first bus by a couple minutes then I was automatically an hour late since they didn’t start running every half hour until a couple hours later in the day.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ll bet there’s a pattern to it. If you found out which companies have hybrid office policies, and which days of the week they go in, I bet it would align nicely with the days that the traffic is worse.