With the 2024 presidential race beginning to unfold, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont said he believes that President Joe Biden will again earn the Democratic nomination — and the president likely win reelection if he runs on a strong progressive campaign.

“I think at this moment … we have got to bring the progressive community together to say, you know what, we’re going to fight for a progressive agenda but we cannot have four more years of Donald Trump in the White House,” Sanders said Sunday on “Face the Nation.”

Sanders endorsed Mr. Biden in April. Sanders referenced several of those issues in underscoring what he believes is the importance of building “a strong progressive agenda” to win the presidency in 2024.

  • CMahaff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look, I’d love for that to be true, but it just isn’t. Biden will win by being a boring centrist, because that’s who he is and that’s who will win a general election (generally speaking).

    With the GOP going completely off the rails the easiest path to victory is to simply go middle of the road and pick up all those independents/centrists and conservatives with brains. Progressives will vote Biden regardless because Trump (or any Trump wannabe) is too terrifying of a reality.

    This country has never shown it has some giant progressive silent majority - Bernie would know, he bet and lost on that materializing in his own presidential runs.

    I don’t see Democrats running hard on progressive policies until either the GOP starts running moderates again (forcing Democrats to pickup votes elsewhere) or young people prove they can be a force at the ballot box.

    All this is not to shit on what Biden has achieved, because he has done things for progressives, but I don’t see him suddenly switching to anything resembling a “strong progressive agenda” because it will just give his GOP opponent ammo to claim “see he’s radical too”. Biden will be the most boring, normal politician he can, while highlighting how bad things will get if his extreme opponent gets into office, and that’s probably the smartest thing to do.

    • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      This country has never shown it has some giant progressive silent majority - Bernie would know, he bet and lost on that materializing in his own presidential runs.

      nonsense. The dems pulled the dirtiest tricks to kneecap bernie - including ALL of them dropping out on super Tuesday. They battled bernie harder than they fucking did trump. Don’t spread garbage like this

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The dems pulled the dirtiest tricks to kneecap bernie

        This was, of course, documented in the Wikileaks e-mails, whose contents were largely ignored by the mainstream media.

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wikileaks selectively leaks emails to push whatever narrative they want, including leaving off timestamps to make you think emails were sent before they were. The RNC was hacked too, but we didn’t see those emails. There’s one corrupt country that hasn’t ever seemed to be attacked by Wikileaks. I wonder what all this has in common?

      • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bernie had a surprising turnout, and the Dems had to pull all the stops to prevent him from being the front runner. Meaning something in the ballpark of a quarter of Americans who actually bother to vote were supporting him. Far from a majority, but to your point, it’s a big and growing political force.

        But I think the point stands that they aren’t likely to swing a general election. Progressives (those that actually vote at all) are almost certainly going to vote for Biden regardless how how much he panders to them. This election will be decided by a fairly small number of centrists and moderate Republicans that may have been alienated by Trump who happen to live in swing states.

        Unless, of course, Biden does something monumentally stupid and pisses off the progressives so bad that they are willing to risk another Trump term and vote 3rd party, which seems unlikely.

        • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          The way people vote and the policies people actually want enacted are very different. If you’re talking specifically about how people vote, there’s a lot you can infer as to why they vote the way they do, but if we’re talking about actual policy - if people voted for policies instead of politicians, the vast majority of americans are very progressive. This is the point I was disagreeing with the commenter on.

          The polls bear it out time and time again - people want progressive policy, but are afraid to vote for progressive politicians, and hedge their bets on the “safe” candidate.

          • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            people want progressive policy, but are afraid to vote for progressive politicians, and hedge their bets on the “safe” candidate.

            This, so much.

            It’s so, so exhausting to keep on being told that “voters don’t want progressive policies because they don’t vote for progressive candidates” when the same people saying that are also the ones working the hardest (and spending the most money) to defeat progressive candidates by presenting them as ‘risky’ and doing their best to get voters to vote for the candidates backed by more money.

            I would love to see American voting switch to Ranked Choice Voting. I’m tired of hearing the parties leverage voters’ fear of splitting the vote into compromising on a vote that ‘can win’- that pattern wags the dog far too much for my liking.

            It’s also frustrating to watch the Dems fight against taking up policy that young people say they want because “young people don’t vote”. It’s as if people won’t vote for you if you keep on promising not to do the things they want

            • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Stop being an entitled idiot and Vote.

              Please don’t assume I’m entitled or an idiot, and I do vote.
              I vote consistently for Democrats in the general because they’re the least-bad option. I participate in the primaries. I am trying to help, try not to shoot the messenger.

              With that said, this was a pitch-perfect example of jumping to the wrong conclusion and being a jerk about the thing you imagined (even though I am not it). I should be allowed to express frustration over what I see as self-defeating behavior, and sure enough you volunteered to exemplify it by turning what could have been a constructive exchange into a shitty one. Do better.

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s also frustrating to watch the Dems fight against taking up policy that young people say they want because “young people don’t vote”. It’s as if people won’t vote for you if you keep on promising not to do the things they want

              Stop being an entitled idiot and Vote. It’s that simple. Turnout for local elections, primaries, and off big ticket years is abysmal. There are no excuses. You have the power to vote for whomever you want. You can even write-in someone. Stop complaining that the status-quo won’t change for you. You aren’t going to get what you want by saying it. Vote or Run for those policies. If a majority of people don’t agree with you, then that’s that. You can push for ranked choice, but you aren’t going to get it complaining about it. You have to vote.

          • danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, Trump’s cult and “Vote Blue No Matter Who” don’t help things either. The election system needs a major overhaul or we’re going to keep getting incompetent old guys.

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Vote Blue No Matter Who” don’t help things either

              It absolutely helps. Republicans make things worse. The worst Democrat keeps things the same. Same > Worse. Vote in the Primary to decide on what Democrat gets to run.

              • danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Doesn’t help that Sanders dropped out and we ended up with Biden, who everybody thinks is a moderate but says racist shit all the time “by accident.”

                People think he’s this sweet grandpa, but he’s an old man with dementia and a questionable history, who needs to retire. But he gets away with it because he’s got a D after his name.

                • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I can’t give a shit about any negative traits that Biden has that every Republican also has worse. It comes off as apathy spreading bullshit and that’s how we got a criminal con man who attempted a coup.

                  • danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    And the best the Democrats could do is some racist geriatric with dementia who belongs in a nursing home. But don’t worry, he understands the wildfires in Maui because he burned his kitchen down once and had some ice cream.

                    With Democrats, every issue that matters just gets pushed off to the next election. “Give me four more years and I’ll legalize abortion again!” And during covid, they became the fascists they pretend to hate, enforcing mandates and then partying in Republican-led states like Florida. “Rules for thee but not for me!”

                    This is why I don’t take either side seriously. We know where Republicans stand, but the Democrats aren’t doing any better and it’s all somebody else’s fault.

      • Asuka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve yet to see any evidence that there was some orchestrated agenda against Bernie. Sure, all the moderates probably did drop out so that moderate Biden could win against Bernie. What’s wrong with that? Isn’t that sort of implicitly how it works and should work? They made a choice that sacrified their own candidacy for the sake of advancing their policy goals (through Biden).

        Nor have I seen any evidence that the DNC orchestrated some sting against Bernie in 2016 - the most that ever came out of that leaked trove of DNC emails were some DNC staff saying they wanted Hillary to win - not that they were going to take any action to make that happen.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure, all the moderates probably did drop out so that moderate Biden could win against Bernie.

          I was a bit disappointed and wanted Bernie, but you’re right that there wasn’t really anything wrong with them doing that.

          Not only that, but it showed that they aren’t like the crabs in a bucket Republicans who failed to do the same because of their own egos and allowed Trump to ascend to the nomination through a series of plurality wins.

          In my opinion, it shows they aren’t dumb fascists and actually put the party and their country ahead of their own power and self-interest.

        • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          We can go even further and assume the democrats were all purely working in good faith, with the end goal of helping people. Even if that were the case, the idea that americans don’t want progressive policy is still garbage and is completely trashed by polling. The polling alone disproves the commenter’s completely contrafactual claim. It’s demonstrably wrong on several levels.

          regardless, the DNC could just overrule the results of the primaries if they wanted to and it’d be above board. It’s completely legal. Biden could win 100% of the vote in every primary and they could put forward some random dude from Kentucky as their candidate and it would be “how it works”. I disagree that that’s how it should work.

      • Alex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sad but harsh reality, it’s not pretty but just how democracy functions under FPTP-voting with zero campaign finance subsidy available. If you can’t pick up popularity in one of the two big parties you’re shit out of options in the current system - designed by wealthy romans for the benefit of wealthy romans. If not allowed to evolve the great experiment is doomed at the whim of the super rich whenever enough lose their minds into fascism.

      • Hankaaron@yall.theatl.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it was trump v Bernie we would still have president trump right now. I’m in GA and there is basically not a single Bernie voter here. And as we all know ours and other swing states were key.

          • Estiar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d like to see the polls you found. I usually go to Five Thirty Eight for their polls, because they have a lot there. They do tend to go down as center left, and I’d like to see other polling agencies, especially those that focus on the socialist side of things

            • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was nearly unanimous amongst the polls. Nate Silver is an absolute moron lol. Not that him being an idiot directly means his polling is trash. This guy made one prediction correctly, got famous for it, and now think he’s fucking nastrodamus, spewing the dumbest assed takes. he’s the definition of the saying “scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds”

              • Estiar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Biden also wins around the same against Trump according to RCP polling aggregation. Really nice site though I’ll definitely look at it. Not sure why you think Nate Silver is a fascist though. He isn’t a pundit, more so just a statistics nerd. If anything the Five thirty-eight team is against Trump, who is the fascist American’s pick.

                • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Biden also wins around the same against Trump

                  Okay. What’s your point? Does it have anything to do with the discussion around the population of americans that want progressive policy?

                  When Bernie was a threat, Nate Silver and lots of liberals were saying shit like they’d vote for trump over bernie, or just simply not vote if bernie was the nominee. They’ll side with fascists against if they think progressive will threaten their power

                • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  To those types, because liberals aren’t doing enough in their eyes to oppose the fascists, the quote of sitting at a table with fascists applies, therefore all liberals are fascists too

                  • Estiar@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Then all communists and socialists are Fascist also. Mussolini was an ardent socialist before being a fascist, and indeed still considered himself a Socialist. Joseph Stalin signed the Molotov-Ribbontrop pact with Adolph Hitler, who was a thug for the Marxists before starting his National Socialist Workers Party. The Conservatives who value the appeal of Strength that Fascist thinkers call out with also fall prey to Fascism

                    Indeed the Liberal Government of the United States subverted governments to install Fascist governments in South America such as the government under Pinochet. You and I both have the potential to be Fascist. I do not think that Nate Silver is any more of a Fascist than you or me, simply because he doesn’t shout from the street corners about the evils of Fascism.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m trying to follow your logic. How does other candidates dropping out on Super Tuesday screw Bernie? Those voters didn’t vote for Bernie.

        • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you trying to follow my logic, or have you already reached your conclusion? Looking at your comments on just this thread, it feels like it would be a waste of time to engage

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t understand what your implying. If the field remained messy Bernie could have won like Trump did in 2016? Right now it reads like you assume those votes that went against Bernie would have just became his or something. Idk.

            • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was really clear. But now it’s really clear instead of following the thread, you’re trying to shoehorn in your opinions, under the guise of “oh please help me understand”. That’s why I explained that it’s a waste of time to engage.

              • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I simply ask why everyone dropping out on Super Tuesday is a dirty trick. I can’t even tell you if I agree or disagree with your conclusion because I don’t know what the hell you’re talking about. You took the time to reply again without explaining yourself, so clearly it’s not about wasting time.

    • minnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      because it will just give his GOP opponent ammo to claim “see he’s radical too”.

      But they already do that, so why care?

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I voted for Biden in hopes that

      1. The clown show would be over

      2. We would get one nice progressive win.

      He gave me half of what I wanted. So I guess partial victory.

      • 2piradians@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the independent litmus test were “do you find some of Trump’s policies acceptable?” then sure, I would agree with you. But that’s incorrect. Republicans embracing full-blown insanity has taken them out of the running for many independents, leaving them only with whomever the Dems decide to nominate.

        So in that sense I suppose you’re right–when one of the choices is always hate-fueled insanity, many independents become de facto Dems.

      • qwrty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Trump =/= Republican Party Independent =/= centrist (or whatever you mean by “someone that has a so-so opinion of trump” and most centrists I know dislike him. idk the statistics of independent support of Trump, but I would guess that it is very low)

        Independents exist, as independents are just voters with no allegiance to one particular party. (Sometimes third-parties are included) This includes centrists, libertarians, and any one else who doesn’t associate with a party. Just because you have been polarized doesn’t mean everyone has.

      • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t know anyone who doesn’t vote for the same party in every single election? I know several, and my wife and I decide who to vote for each election based on their platform and track record rather than the letter next to their name.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      With the GOP going completely off the rails the easiest path to victory is to simply go middle of the road and pick up all those independents/centrists and conservatives with brains.

      I think we may have found out that’s a risky strategy in the general election in 2016. It’s as if having a choice between a status quo centrist and republican crazies isn’t good for turnout- when the American Dream is increasingly regarded to be a cruel joke by young voters and the result is such low turnout that if ‘did not vote’ had been a candidate it would have won, maybe it’s time for the Dems do some soul searching here.

      I don’t see him suddenly switching to anything resembling a “strong progressive agenda” because it will just give his GOP opponent ammo to claim “see he’s radical too”.

      I don’t see him switching either, and in any case it doesn’t make sense for him to run away from progressives to avoid being called radical- after all, they’re calling him radical anyhow and it’s unlikely they’d stop doing that

      To the extent that running to ‘the center’ is seen as just appeasing Republicans in trade for no benefit to anyone but those Republicans (I think it is seen that way by a lot of younger, left and independent voters), I take the view that the one thing the Democrats must do (if they do nothing else) is keep on pressing hard on antitrust enforcement and restoring unions and labor protections and promoting environmental protection. If they don’t, I expect a lot of stupid protest votes going to the green party or other splitter factions set there to split the democrats and lower the bar enough for the GOP to heave a fascist boomer into the white house where they will finish the job of dismantling American democracy

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This country has never shown it has some giant progressive silent majority - Bernie would know, he bet and lost on that materializing in his own presidential runs.

      Yea I laughed when I read this headline. Man who failed to win with strategy thinks candidate will win with same strategy.