they were haranguing you for proof socialism works in the USA. I have the answer
they were haranguing you for proof socialism works in the USA. I have the answer
american socialist enclaves: the swamp maroons, the anabaptists
that’s not funding.
I seem to recall that the anonymity of car is based on obscuring transactions through bundling, but that method was deanonymized by poisoning wallrts somehow. this was like 10 years ago so my memory is fuzzy.
I didn’t say he’s off base. I said it’s useless. he’s not actually making a claim that I can use to predict anything.
what is the rate at which consolidation if parties occurs? if a fptp system exists with more than two parties, what reason do we have to believe it will consolidate, and when?
it’s a critical rationalist examination that would label it tautological: it’s true and it’s always true because of how weasley the wording is. “people tend to do the right thing” is a tautological claim because every example of people not doing the right thing is already covered in theassive loophole opened with the term “tend”. there is no way to set up a test to disprove it.
i came here from the modlog and i just want to say that i think the removal is fine(ish), and the comment to which i’m replying is, basically, wrong, but the mod’s explanation is also wrong and needs to be called out.
everything is political, even birth control, and it would be even if no one was trying to ban it (though i think it was inevitable that this is the case). birth control is a means by which people who can become pregnant can actively choose to prevent that. pregnancy comes with a variety of political expectations and consequences, and so choosing to prevent pregnancy is political.
as for the mask thing, i do think that there are some very-online right wingers who would have the same analysis as the user to whom i am responding, but, in fact, that reasoning is a desire to avoid political entanglement, so it is not actually an explanation of how masking is political. it’s also not the case that wearing the mask is carrying a banner for fauci, although i believe there are factions on the right who see it this way.
so, to reiterate, removing was fine (though probably unnecessary), the commenter is a dum dum, but the mod doesn’t know what “political” means and that is a really bad omen for this sub.
i thought monero’s mixer was show to be susceptible to poisoning.
duverger’s law is not actually a law at all, but a tautology. it has no actual predictive power, and hand-waves away evidence of instances where it has not turned out to be true.
no, there isn’t. it’s a term coined in the 1940s in colonialist Britain.
no joke, you know the brie and gummy worms work.
His video on First Past the Post voting should be mandatory to watch.
he doesn’t actually state in that video what should be the biggest takeaway: strategic voting is what leads to consolidation of parties, so your best interest longterm is to vote your values, even if doing so has a likelihood of losing short term.
enough people going vegan would probably have a noticeable effect on the animal agriculture industry.
certainly, but perhaps not the effect you are expecting. your assertion that you know what their reaction would be, and that it would be to accept making less money, is just not likely true.
i think most people have degrees to all of their feelings.
has anyone else ever been able to repeat your results?
so your want is binary either you do want it, or you don’t, and there are no degrees?
it is never the less there.
this sounds like a statement of faith, rather than fact.
Yeah, I stopped, and it has had an impact.
great! can you show me on this chart?
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/meat-production-tonnes?tab=chart&country=~OWID_WRL
copying isn’t stealing