Fillory and Further by Christopher Plover
within
The Magicians by Lev Grossman
Fillory and Further by Christopher Plover
within
The Magicians by Lev Grossman
If you want gourds next year and you don’t mind absolute chaos, grow some butternut squash.
Yeah, that pretty much aligns with what I thought. A comment downvoted to -122.
First part is true, but irrelevant since it’s a blue district like I tried to explain to the other dude. When I say blue, I mean she more than doubled her next closest opponent (the Republican candidate)'s votes. It would be a waste of AIPAC’s money from their perspective.
Second part sounds like fan fiction because the users on Lemmy I’ve interacted with don’t sound like people who want to see a solidly blue district turn red.
That’s a primary. Different places have primaries at different times.
Yeah it does, because in the general election, she’ll be the only Democrat. That’s the purpose of the primary.
She won her primary a couple months ago and she’s in a very blue district.
Gaps #93
🎥 🟩 ⬛ ⬛ ⬛ ⬛ ⬛
https://gaps.wtf
I’m surprised I got this. Do they give you hints if you get it wrong?
It was always bs, but people on the Internet like spreading lies. I saw some politician go on MSNBC and she brought it up too. It’s embarrassing if she believed it and spread it.
This isn’t projection. They’re not saying “fascists”.
You joke, but I always like that the Poynting vector, which points in the direction of flow of an EM wave is named after John Henry Poynting.
I bet that guy was trying so hard to find a vector to get named after him.
I’ve never heard of Ruy Lopez. I know of all of the yellow cells, though. That whole final blue group I could only imagine getting by process of elimination.
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟪🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟦
This sounds like Rubberduck debugging.
Word Grid #57
🟦🟧🟩
🟪🟦🟧
🟪🟧🟩
Rarity: 26.77
wordgrid.clevergoat.com 🐐
I don’t think I understand the game. Is it better for your answers to be rare?
Computer Scientist: 0 and a carry bit
Mathematician: S(1)
I wish all the people on the left who think Hillary were going to get picked were gamblers. You could stand to make a lot of money off of them being wrong.
Thanks for checking that. YouTube has been doing weird things if you click the share button at the wrong time.
Hopefully this works: https://youtu.be/g1_V_4sMoOg
They are programmatically token predictors. It will never be “closer” to intelligence for that very reason. The broader question should be, “can a token predictor simulate intelligence?”