• 0 Posts
  • 3.07K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle








  • He’s still not a villain, like some like to say, but definitely not the good guy we all think of when we use that term. He’s a kid who was put into a horrible situation with no good outcome. He sacrificed his humanity to try to guide the rest of humanity on the best path. Humans were just flawed because they wanted a glorious leader and they needed to learn not to trust someone with that much power.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldOh Joe...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The obvious answer is Harris. The less obvious but I think better option is Buttigieg. He’s not who I would pick ideally, but I think people still remember him and he’s part of the Biden adm.

    I’m pretty confident they’re running Biden unless he dies though.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldOh Joe...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    The issue is appearances are all that mattered. I don’t believe anyone who was interested enough in politics to watch that debate was undecided. It’s now time for the campaigns to cut up the debate to use for ads that will actually reach the undecided voters. I feel it’s going to hurt Biden a lot more than Trump.



  • Cethin@lemmy.zipto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonemonster high rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably depends on the math. If it’s descrete math, or anything where you have to prove something, having internet access isn’t going to help (unless the test has been reused and uploaded). Either you can write a proof or you can’t. Looking something up probably can only get your so far.






  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoMinecraft@lemmy.worldSynchronizing two pistons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I haven’t done much MC Redstone in a long time (not in any significant way since some time observers were added). Couldn’t you take the inverse signal for piston 2 and put it in an and gate to piston 1 (or vice versa). Basically make your circuit (p1/2 is piston 1/2) : p1= observer && !p2. p2 = delayed observer.

    Edit: Actually, the delay might fuck this up. I don’t know if I can help. It’s been far too long. I don’t have the intuition for it anymore.