The whole point of the article is to pretend that masks prevent the spread of covid.
The whole point of the article is to pretend that masks prevent the spread of covid.
What year do you think the rewrite of the anne frank book was took place?
The reason I am fighting about this is because those jackasses lied to us and didnt let people work. I literally had to nearly lay off all of my staff because of this shutdown bullshit. People that couldnt go on unemployment and would have just been fucked. What I care about is the truth, not the propaganda and lies. I am not on one of your guys teams, I am person that likes to think for myself and actually look at facts not propaganda. The story above is obvious propaganda, and I will fight that whenever I see it.
I am glad that you came back to the religion!
No thank you, but I appreciate the thought!!
No lockdowns did not work and we knew that in spring of 2020. I remember watching the CDC data to see what happened and absotely nothing happened. And then later this JPmorgan study came out. Why do you just believe the lies they tell you when there is zero evidence to back it up?
No, that is not how you do a data analysis you use the best data you have. That is why having 50 separate data points is amazing, we can do a great apples to apples comparison. The problem is that this isnt about data, its about you guys not knowing how wrong you were for years (and apparently still wrong).
Cool then there must be gobs of evidence about how effective al the lockdowns and mask mandates were… Or maybe the data proves just the opposite. Here is a website to illistrate! https://www.covidchartsquiz.com/
No… the distancing thing literally was made up out of nowhere during covid. And I have no issue with masks, but when you guys pretend that the Mayor of LA wouldnt have gotten covid if she wore a mask, is not science, its faith… Literally its become a religion with you guys, masks did not make a measurable difference, and lockdowns were actively harmful.
Do surgeons wear masks from a bin at home depot too? Personally I dont care about the rhetoric, I care about data and the data for masks working were not there. The evidence that lockdowns worked was non existent because they didnt. All the shit you made us do didnt work, and that is obvious if you look at actual number not dumb stories like the one this post is about.
I actually used the government data, but sure, you can believe whatever youtube science you want.
Yeah I get it, all of the major institutions were on onboard. There is a difference between propaganda to get people to do a thing and actual results. Here is a quiz you can take to illistrate! https://www.covidchartsquiz.com/
I am actually just going with “muh science” and “muh statistics” on this one… But if all you guys pretend that masks and lockdowns worked then maybe it will become true!
Its good to know you guys are back at it again!
Are we pretending that masks stop covid transmission again?
If “clutch your pearls too hard” means hating it when sexual things get shown to minors, then I will clutch those pearls till they shatter. Why are you okay with sexual material being shown to children?
Yes exactly, they want to band “Anne Franks diary”, which is a distinct book that is not “The Diary of Anne Frank”. Do you understand how they used propaganda and it works?
I understand, but there are literally millions of books, why do we have to have the few books with sexual material that a significant portion of parents object to?
Its not The Diary of Anne Frank, its Anne Franks Diary… And thats a great point, why did they add sexual material to a young girls diary that had nothing sexual in it?
The point is that you were wrong again, and still dont know what is going on. The book that they want banned was written in like 2018, its a graphic novel, not the one we all read as kids. You need to actually do some research instead of being aggressively ignorant.