• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    4 months ago

    They complain about political correctness, and they go and do shit like this.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a blatant first amendment violation. Another pro-gamer move from the free speech party.

    • Steve@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Devils advocate here, in some places, deliberately using the wrong pronouns with the intention to harm someone would be hate speech.

      So flip it around, using the preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child and/or their shitty parents.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hate speech is protected by the First Amendment, so flip it around, inclusive speech is also protected by the First Amendment. I’m sure teachers can lose their jobs for hate speech but people cannot be criminally charged for hate speech alone. Prosecuting teachers as sex offenders for using pronouns is a clear and deliberate violation of their Constitutional rights.

          • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            4 months ago

            Legally, you cannot be criminally charged. They will not protect you from the consequences of your speech coming from private parties, whatever those are. You can increase the number or severity of charges for crimes if they are even partially motivated by prejudice towards specific groups, hate speech may be evidence of that motivation.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_States

          • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hate crimes and hate speech are two different, but related, things, so I understand your confusion. You cannot be prosecuted for hate speech, because that is a government infringement on your liberties. They can prosecute you if the hate speech intentionally incites violence, because that is not protected speech. The hate speech can also inform intent to turn another crime into a hate crime.

          • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Also, hate speech is still separate from threatening violence or other harm. I can freely hate you, but I can’t advocate to hurt you.

            I think I have that right.

          • Deello@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Calling someone the N word (hate speech) won’t get you arrested.

            Calling someone the N word while you attack them (hate crime) will.

            Under this context, yes you would be prosecuted for “hate speech” because the criminal activity here is the speech itself. Under any other circumstances you would be allowed to say whatever you like. There are always consequences to your actions, they’re just not always criminal consequences.

            • Steve@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Calling someone the nword is almost always going to make them feel unsafe, which makes it an assault, am I right?

              • Urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Making someone feel unsafe is not assault. Words can compel people to act but they themselves are responsible for their actions.

                That being said, there is a concept of fighting words in the USA. Scroll down to the section titled Post-Chaplinsky, there’s information about the courts’ rulings applying to personal insults.

                Honestly I need to take time to read this wikipedia article a little more thoroughly but I’m on my way out the door. I am not a lawyer I just find law interesting.

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child

        If the child doesn’t want to be called that it’s not their preferred pronoun.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      4 months ago

      When the flip flopper in chief, Mitt Romney, is your only hope, or anyone named Cheney, we’ve got massive problems.

      • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not that I disagree with you.

        But even as a staunch Euro leftist, I think it is okay that there are people I strongly disagree with, even strongly dislike because I think the fight for values that are against my personal morality.

        Both Romney and Cheney are such people.
        I don’t think they should have political power over other people.

        But they share at least a certain common ground with me that the fascists don’t.
        And for how little I actually like those people, I still value this very difference.

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I really can’t comprehend the level of hate that these motherfuckers must possess to write or support such a bill. I mean, let’s say you’re an incredible asshole who doesn’t think that trans people exist, like you think that you know who they are much better than they actually know themselves. Even with that as a baseline, isn’t it still just the polite thing to treat them with basic respect?

    If I found out that someone I just met preferred to use their middle name instead of their first name, I would 100% use that person’s middle name when addressing them. It’s just common courtesy. The same thing goes with a person who’s transitioning - I will use their preferred name, because I’m not a completely deplorable piece of shit.

    But this guy is way worse than someone who intentionally antagonizes people by using their disliked name when addressing them. This guy wants to actively punish anybody who has the rock bottom bare minimum of civility by destroying their lives and livelihoods.

    I just can’t grasp that level of hatred. How is it that this piece of shit shares enough genes with everybody else that he’s recognized as human?

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ah yes, further diluting the term sex offender down to the point the label is meaningless.

    Makes perfect sense to combine teachers who accept pronouns, with people caught publicly urinating on the same list with violent rapists and convicted pedophiles… after all, it’s all the same.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah but they are afraid of everything, so they have to make sure they are rapinga child of the sex that won’t get them labeled as gay. Ye ole Republican mantra, rape is okay so long as it’s not gay.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You wish they were this coherent. Just like the homophobic rightwinger scum in Hungary, which was caught in a huge gay orgy, they will gladly posture one thing in public then do another in private.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a practical result this is more of an attack on education than an attack on LGBT, who would want to be a teacher under such tyrannical rules?

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    How is anyone supposed to know anyone else’s pronouns without asking them?

    Are the teachers supposed to check the genitals of their students at the beginning of the year?

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Naked lessons… naked schools… that way the sneaky trans kids also cannot change during the year.

      • VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        But if everyone is naked, the poor boys will be distracted. I mean, they already veer off course when shoulders are out. I guess the only appropriate solution is to not have the girls at (naked) school. /s

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Zenra made some interesting videos on this topic. For college and adult students obviously.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you never speak about that individual, you won’t need to know their pronouns. If they quit the backbiting and remembered the golden rule, they wouldn’t need to “use pronouns” but then they wouldn’t even be Republicans anymore.

      These politicians love to create “problems to solve” instead of finding solutions to real problems we have.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Lesson learned always use the wrong pronouns randomly so you don’t have to worry about it, who cares. Let’s everyone get together try to love one another right now!

        Or just avoid using pronouns altogether lol, I believe they works for any pronoun

        They their they’re

        Our your we us them

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    study to be a teacher in Missouri
    teach full time for $30,000/year or something
    become a sex offender, obviously can’t teach anymore
    can’t actually find a job at all
    forced to live in a designated trailer park for pedophiles
    become a lifelong welfare recipient

    nice one, conservatives

  • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t like your teacher? Just flip your pronouns real quick and get them on the sex offender list. Problem solved.

    Fuck this bullshit

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What do you mean? Would a kid lie about their sex? Why mental health issues? Abuse? Clout? Trolling? What about if they are just confused? They would not become sex offenders or found guilty of anything for a honest mistake