• Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ooh. I like that. We should do that too. Just the microtransaction-based ones, not all online games. Decent subscription-based games should be exempt.

    And I say that as someone that wishes he could be a Supercell fan. Used to be a huge one.

    • aswz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be clear, this ruling seems to be online gaming as in gambling, not video games

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, well, that’s not bad either. Frankly they should just expand it though. It’s not like gatcha games aren’t a sort of gambling enterprise.

        • Beliriel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is frankly fantastic news. You just need to classify gacha as gambling and you’re done. This is probably way easier than to legally define what a gacha game is.

  • NeoAgostosTheos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did not expect India to be the one to push back on the predatory behavior of micro transactions. Having lived in India for a long time, I’m not sure how much of it is greed but still a positive outcome I guess!

    • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I read, the tax is on online gaming as in gambling, apps, not gacha-style microtransactions. Still a good thing though.

    • xuxebiko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Modi is least bothered by financially predatory behaviour, his govt is desperately trying to raise funds.