• Saganastic@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can be passionate about technological advancement and also be concerned about rent prices, funding for schools, and climate change. Let people solve the problems they’re able to solve.

    • Rom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but the point of the comic is that while technological advances for “cool” things get all kinds of attention and development, actual social problems that continue to impact billions of people hardly get any focus.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but when you have billions at your disposal you have a much greater moral responsability than a fresh out of uni geek. He could greatly contribute to our urgent problems.

      • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Musk can’t make a marriage between two people work: and you want to trust him with the world because he is greedy ?

        Tax all of those oppressors.

    • Frittiert@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So why don’t we look after people if we have the means?

      Who has the means? Why don’t they share and use their wealth to really help people and create progress?

      And why do we let them act this way?

    • mohKohn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the specific people are all (with the exception of Sam Altmann) grifters. they are

      1. guy whose sub imploded at the titanic
        2 Sam Altman, head of OpenAI (which went from charity to a wing of Microsoft).
      2. Sam Bankman Freid’s brother, who was talking about buying an island to carry “effective altruists” through an extinction-level event.

      It pisses me off that these are the first EA adjacent people that are broadly well-known, rather than Givewell and 80,000 hours, who are actually doing good work.

        • mohKohn@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          EA is primarily advice for people with moderate amounts of disposable income (i.e. middle class), or people trying to figure out their career trajectory. Earn to give is very much a minority position, and that’s pretty much the only one that at all involves aiming to be rich.

          Longtermism is mostly a weird set of academics. the recent folks using it as a pretext to buy houses in the Caribbean are almost purely a group of cryptobros using it as a way to ethics-wash their pump and dump.