Kenneth Eugene Smith’s execution would be the nation’s first using nitrogen gas.

Lawyers for a spiritual adviser to an Alabama inmate scheduled to be executed with nitrogen gas next month said in a complaint filed Wednesday that restrictions on how close the adviser can get to the inmate in the death chamber are “hostile to religion.”

The Rev. Jeff Hood, who plans to enter the death chamber to minister to Kenneth Eugene Smith, said the Alabama Department of Corrections asked him to sign a form acknowledging the risks and agreeing to stay 3 feet (0.9 meters) away from Smith’s gas mask. Hood, a death penalty opponent, said that shows there is a risk to witnesses attending the execution. He said the restrictions would also interfere with his ability to minister to Smith before he is put to death.

“They’ve asked me to sign a waiver, which to me speaks to the fact that they’re already concerned that things could go wrong,” Hood said in a telephone interview.

Smith’s execution would be the nation’s first using nitrogen gas. The nitrogen is planned be administered through the gas mask placed over Smith’s nose and mouth while he is strapped to a gurney in the death chamber normally used for lethal injections.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Or they’re worried he will accidentally dislodge the mask and interfere with the proper administration of nitrogen. There is no actual danger to breathing nitrogen - the air we breathe is mostly nitrogen - we just need oxygen mixed in. It’s all a stage play for delaying his execution.

    I’m not in favor of execution, but this is the most humane method we have available. So until we can stop executing people, it would be good not to fuck with doing it in this way.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The article says the concern is if the masks leaks or becomes dislodged, the area within 2 feet might have the oxygen replaced.

      So they said once the gas is on, the priest has to be at least 3 feet away.

      But apparently the priest wants to touch him during it?

      Like. That wouldn’t work with the electric chair either.

      Edit:

      And to clarify, the person being executed is the one suing because he wants the priest to touch him while he dies.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        7 months ago

        Put the preist in SCBA gear (thing firefighters). Might as well turn this primitive practice (capital executions and preists) and go full on distopian clown show.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Honest question. How is anything more humane than a bullet to the brain stem?

      Hell even something like the cattle bolt or if you wanna get real technical on a pain scale something that immediately destroys the entire brain?

      Like personally just put my head in a machine that crushes my head so fast that I couldn’t possibly perceive it.

      Tbh I guess I just don’t really comprehend what “humane” means. The way everyone talks about it makes it seem like it just means not leaving a mess.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d be worried about any such machine failing and only grievously injuring me.

        In the case of inert gas asphyxiation, failure doesn’t hurt. Just try again.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Brain damage is painless, and transient because they’re just going to redo the execution anyway.

            • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Uh what, brain damage can cause major issues like seizures and migraines. Having debilitating seizures or migraines for weeks or months till they can reschedule the execution sounds pretty bad.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                7 months ago

                There’s no need for rescheduling, just crank up the nitrogen and keep going.

                I mean, if you really really want to imagine a scenario where the execution fails and the victim is left in pain for an extended period, you can do that with any method. You could imagine a scenario where the subject is strapped to a nuclear bomb that still ends up surviving with misery and pain. But you have to go to extremely unlikely outcomes with something as utterly dead simple as “flood the lungs with nitrogen”.

      • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are a lot of things that can go wrong with a gun and a bullet. With a nitrogen mask, the worst is that it just won’t work.

        Just falling asleep, with no sensation of suffocating, no struggling, seems like the best option out of a lot of bad options.

      • GCanuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Humane, in these types of circumstances, are not just for the victim, but for the witnesses and executioners as well.

        The internet legend that created the suicide helmet is likely the way I’d want to go given the choice. But it would not be a pleasant thing to witness.

        FTR: I’m fully against the death penalty. It is a barbaric practise. But I still feel that those who participate in this horrible exercise shouldn’t be traumatized either.

      • foyrkopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        All the advances in execution methods haven’t been made to make it more humane to the victim - they’ve been made so it seems more humane to everyone else.

        AFAIK, statistics-wise, the execution method with the lowest quota of horrible mishaps is the guillotine. A sufficiently fast 4t weight to the head would probably be even quicker for the brain to go, although it’d also require more cleanup.

        (Yes, even overdosing on narcotics has more mishaps - and there are little to no narcotics abailable for executions, because the producers don’t want them to be used for that.)

        All of the more reliable methods are… grisly, and civilisation doesn’t want grisly. We want to press a button and the victim goes to sleep to never wake up, because that makes it easier on us.

  • Birdie@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I guess if we want to be respectful to religion, we should stone him and the preacher can get as close as he wants. I bet he wouldn’t have a problem standing at a distance in that scenario.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yea, definitely had me going “wait you still want him to be put to death?” until I got down the comment chain.

          Tbf Lemmy has a disproportionate number of tankies, who I’d reason would actually hold an anti-religion/pro-capital-punishment stance.

          • nixcamic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Tbf Lemmy has a disproportionate number of tankies, who I’d reason would actually hold an anti-religion/pro-capital-punishment stance.

            Yeah that’s what I thought it was.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mine as well. I deal with big industrial stuff which involves nitrogen lines often. Making a leak at a site would be pretty easy. Looks like an accident and my family gets a few million.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe so but I am not going to spend years rotting from bed sores while some underpaid staff punish me for complaining by leaving my diaper on.

          My wife is a nurse and quit her old employer the night she had to give a statement to the police about how one of the aids beat a dementia patient out of revenge . Who was a different CNA one that quite literally walked over a patient who had fallen out of bed because “it is my lunch break”.

          Nope. Not doing it. I gave up almost everything for my family they don’t have the right to demand that I cling to a life with zero quality.

          • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            My dad is dying of dementia right now, not saying you have to ride that out. I’m saying you owe yourself and your family the time between retirement and sharp decline.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              I am sorry you are enduring that and frankly I don’t want to argue about my last wishes with someone who is enduring the misery you must be. No offense but I enjoy looking at myself in the mirror.

              Be well, your point is taken and I will consider it.

              • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Again, I would understand if someone wanted to end it before serious decline set in. Just not just in case before retirement to get my family some money. Because again, if there’s real quality time to be had with someone who’s still definitely your father/husband as opposed to a shell with a bit of them left inside. Then they’d rather have that than the money. I wouldn’t judge anyone for sparing themselves that latter stage though, I have no idea what I will do if that choice comes to me.

      • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        You don’t want to do opiate overdose. I once found a dude overdosing. He was already at the agonal breathing stage. It sounded like a loud short snore about 1 every 2 min. I followed the sound to the bathroom. There was brown liquid leaking out from under the door. I tried to open the door but it wouldn’t budge. So I turned the knob and put my shoulder into the door forcing it open.

        There on the floor was my best friend in the world since we were six years old. His pants were around his ankles and that brown liquid was the vomit he was choking on. Unknown to me he had been there a couple of hours.

        I called 911 and they came and got him. He spent a week in the hospital, but when he came out he was different. For one thing he had lost his short term memory. He’d tell you something. Then 2 mins later tell you again like you never heard it before. But also something on a fundamental level was different.

        A few years later 2 days after Christmas it was his mom’s birthday. She made him stay in the basement because she was afraid he’d embarrass her in front of her guests. After the party they went down to check on him and he was dead of an overdose.

        TLDR: Don’t use heroin as an end of life plan. The margin of error is too large and if you fuck it up you’ll be tarded for the rest of your life.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s arguably the most humane way to do it though.
    Granted, I think the death penalty is wrong in 99.9% of cases but if it needs to be done then it should be humane.

    And for the 0.01% of cases I’m taking about, it should be reserved only for people who demonstrate that their continued existence would harm other people.
    I lived in fear for 20 years that my grandpa would get out of prison and kill me and my family for putting him in there in the first place, and he absolutely would have too.
    A death sentence would have saved my entire family decades of mental anguish.
    Every 5 years we had to contest his parole hearing just to sit on edge for the next 5 years while we waited for the next one.

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    So use an old fashioned gas chamber instead of a mask? This never seemed to be an issue when inmates were executed that way…

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because the state had much more leeway to trample on people’s rights at that time. My gut tells me you didn’t read the article. I didn’t either, but I just listened to a podcast about this case yesterday.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Definitely haven’t been any holy wars, witch hunts, or inquisitions.

      Killing in the name of God is kind of a thing

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, like… One in particular. Buddhism, not Eastern Wind Buddhism (I am only tangentially familiar with that version of the religion, so I cannot speak to strongly on it’s teachings) is the only religion I know of that actually shows any real reverence for life.

      Side note, even most Buddhist nations still permit abortion and practice capital punishment, though both are heavily socially stigmatized unless the abortion is medically necessary.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sure there is nothing directly that advocates capital punishment in Buddhist tradition but they do have the Angulimala story which, in most versions, the Buddha tells him to accept his fate to be executed for murder. Also you know in practice the Tibetan theocracy was willing to do it for the crime of heresy.

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why would any religion that has reincarnation be against abortion? At worst, it’s a spawn kill - respawn in 30 seconds elsewhere and carry on.

        • TomAwsm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          To be fair, it’s impossible to know how long the respawn timer is. Also, spawn killing is not cool.

          (this is purely a joke and has no connection to my views on abortion)

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The only thing attributed directly to the Buddha about abortion is him saying that he didn’t want it to be used to conceal adultery. So technically he wasn’t even against it, he was against it being used as a tool to do something else.