I’ve taken it too far haven’t I?

  • nezbyte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    8 months ago

    What do you plan to do with the extra 17 switches that aren’t necessary for morse code?

    • Hannah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair I am planning on putting them back at some point.

      I’m working on a core 18-key layout that I can expand anywhere up to 34 keys, so I have a consistent layout that I can use on some of the unibody split keyboards that are usually in that range of keys.

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Eh, I don’t get it at all so I can’t judge. I feel like even a 104 key-layout is kinda lacking, a keyboad just doesn’t seem like the right place for minimalism to me.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Layers.

      The main idea is to put everything in layers (think like an fn button on a laptop) so that you have access to the 100+ keys but without having to move your hands around

      I wouldn’t call it minimalism, since with smaller size comes more complex layouts in order to still have everything accessible

  • kewko@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nahh, 2 half numpads is, still, like, nearly double the number of fingers you have, so waay overkill with all that finger movement

    • Hannah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Personally I’m not sure it’s worth it longer term. 5x3+2 is my preference but I’m doing this to sort my layers so I can try some of the unibody split keyboards that have less keys to go round.

  • puppybox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bit too low for me but interesting. I think ditching pinky column completely is too much, I’d rather go 3*4+2 per hand minimum.

    What’s the layout?

    • Hannah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah I’m doing it to establish a common layout for my symbol / number / navigation layers more than anything else, so I can expand from there to some 28 and 30 key keyboards as well as the Ferris Sweep with some consistant muscle memory.

      • puppybox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        https://github.com/jaroslaw-weber/code-pillow

        This is mine (I have few changes tho) if you want some inspiration :) it’s 34 based on Canary layout.

        I really love small format but I struggle with chords misfiring. But it’s a good mix of one shot (shift and symbol layer) with hold (navigation) layers. I think I couldn’t go lower without sacrificing typing speed.

    • Hannah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s my own layout starting from Colemak DH with the “missing” outer keys on another layer.