Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Historical arms & armor Youtubers such as Skallagrim, Metatron, etc.
Tons of information regarding historical weapons & armor (with the occasional spotlight for more obscure types of stuff) but generally attracts a pretty reactionary community. (My guess as to why this kind of stuff attract reactionaries is probably because most of them tend to fetishize traditions & ye olde days rather than critically analyze them out of genuine interest. For instance, the Middle Ages are particularly interesting to me (especially the combat related stuff) but I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in those times.)
If you understand Russian, I would suggest listening to Klim Zhukov (yes, apparently related to that Zhukov). He is an actual professional historian and a communist. His videos aren’t flashy and are mostly just him talking a lot, but they are always factual, based on real research (not just pop history) and he occasionally branches out to note the diamat approach when analysing historical events
Historical arms & armor Youtubers such as Skallagrim, Metatron, etc.
Tons of information regarding historical weapons & armor (with the occasional spotlight for more obscure types of stuff) but generally attracts a pretty reactionary community. (My guess as to why this kind of stuff attract reactionaries is probably because most of them tend to fetishize traditions & ye olde days rather than critically analyze them out of genuine interest. For instance, the Middle Ages are particularly interesting to me (especially the combat related stuff) but I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in those times.)
If you understand Russian, I would suggest listening to Klim Zhukov (yes, apparently related to that Zhukov). He is an actual professional historian and a communist. His videos aren’t flashy and are mostly just him talking a lot, but they are always factual, based on real research (not just pop history) and he occasionally branches out to note the diamat approach when analysing historical events