• Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Does the CRTC do anything to help Canada at this point? They’ve allowed all telecoms/media to be merged down to 2 and a half entities. They’ve allowed cell and internet service prices to be the highest in the western world. They’ve forced CanCon rules that subsidize media monopolies while driving viewers to non-Canadian platforms. And now they are going to drive other services out of Canada at the request of those same media monopolies.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Under those rules, streaming services that are not Canadian-owned and have more than CAD $25 million (approx. USD $18.5 million)  in revenue in Canada annually are required to pay 5% of that revenue into funds that subsidize Canadian content and creators.

    Under that plan, 1.5% of music streamers’ revenue would go towards subsidies for local radio stations.

    Lol, yea, pay your fucking taxes, grifters.

  • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The letter argued that Canada’s radio regulations were designed to address the problems created by its vast geography, its “linguistic duality” (English and French), and the fact that space on analog radio is limited, making decisions about what gets broadcast necessary.

    Citation needed DiMA. Way to try framing the issue to look in your favour.

    Instead of those “issues” we now have locked down apps and opaque algorithms that reduce user control.

    To be fair I have found some good stuff through the recommendations, but I also don’t know how often they try to boost certain artists because of back room deals. Companies need regulations to keep them slightly honest.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m for it as long as they don’t force Canadian content on users in Canada. I’m all for supporting Canadian artists, but radio in particular is fucking awful bc all they play is rush and metric ad nauseum to meet their content requirements

  • Smk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t understand why streaming should support radio ? They should support artists and new artist via taxes though, that makes total sense.

    But the radio …?

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not sure where you’re getting that from—this isn’t about anyone helping radio stations. The idea is that the government would impose laws and taxes on large streaming services operating in Canada that are somewhat similar to those currently imposed on radio stations in Canada.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because streaming is international while radio is local.

      If international sites wanna play their music in Canada, then they should pay for the privilege.

      • Smk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t understand why streaming services need to help radio stations. Are radio station sharing their profit as well ?

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Under those rules, streaming services that are not Canadian-owned and have more than CAD $25 million (approx. USD $18.5 million) in revenue in Canada annually are required to pay 5% of that revenue into funds that subsidize Canadian content and creators.