Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
The guy that privately owns twitter claimed to be some sort of free speech absolutist.
For once this is not someone getting confused about the first amendment but simply calling out musk’s hypocrisy.
Here’s an article from a year ago that covers the same idea and includes a bunch of direct quotes from musk about his free speech views that his fans love to idolize while his actions bear no resemblance
This time, it’s after he clashed with a BBC reporter over the prevelance of “hate speech” on Twitter. “Free speech is meaningless unless you allow people you don’t like to say things you don’t like,” Musk said in a clip since shared across the internet, including by mega-stars like Joe Rogan.
So musk using “free speech” to defend hate speech and then censoring this because it doesn’t align with his politics is of course legal, but hypocritical, and logically implies that hate speech does align with his political views or at least isn’t as offensive to him as this dossier.
Besides, companies like Twitter should have obligations. It’s not a personal blog with 10 visitors per moth, it’s a big ass media platform that shapes what people around the world see and think. And Musk is actively interfering with this process.
Free speech my ass
Any time they talk about “Free Speech” post the word “Cisgender” and take a picture and post it being blocked.
You should probably go try it out yourself and discover that it’s not actually being blocked and it never has.
Well lemmy isnt any better but at least we can jump ship to another instance once u get perma banned
X is privately owned. Like all social media companies, it has no obligation to be a microphone for anyone.
The guy that privately owns twitter claimed to be some sort of free speech absolutist.
For once this is not someone getting confused about the first amendment but simply calling out musk’s hypocrisy.
Here’s an article from a year ago that covers the same idea and includes a bunch of direct quotes from musk about his free speech views that his fans love to idolize while his actions bear no resemblance
https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-promised-free-speech-twitter-hes-betrayed-it-again-again-opinion-1794478
I’ll save you a click with one pull quote
So musk using “free speech” to defend hate speech and then censoring this because it doesn’t align with his politics is of course legal, but hypocritical, and logically implies that hate speech does align with his political views or at least isn’t as offensive to him as this dossier.
Besides, companies like Twitter should have obligations. It’s not a personal blog with 10 visitors per moth, it’s a big ass media platform that shapes what people around the world see and think. And Musk is actively interfering with this process.
So for fElon it’s not his ass, it’s he’s ass?
Or is it hes’ ass?